Pedophiles may get the same rights as gays?!

Definition of a pedophile: "adult with sexual desire for children: an adult who has sexual desire for children or who has committed the crime of sex with a child"
So you know what a pedophile is, now how about gay: "attracted to same sex: relating to sexual attraction or activity among members of the same sex"

Pedophiles are wanting the same rights as gays now that the gay rights activists have won their rights. Pedophiles think that what they are and what they lust for is a sexual orientation and not a disorder. Pedophiles are now protected under the law for sexual orientation discrimination. They claim they should have the same rights as gays do because they can't control the fact that they have sexual urges for children. They are also saying that because they can't change the way they feel about children that they shouldn't be shunned for it.

Now it says that two psychiatrists in Canada state that pedophilia is a sexual orientation just like being a heterosexual or a homosexual. This means that they think of pedophiles as one of us, just another normal human with 'normal' urges.

Here is a quote from the article that you can find a link to in my sources;

Quinsey said pedophiles’ sexual interests prefer children and, “There is no evidence that this sort of preference can be changed through treatment or through anything else.”

Um... I have something that can cure these disgusting urges- DEATH!
Another quote;

Milton Diamond, a University of Hawaii professor and director of the Pacific Center for Sex and Society, stated that child pornography could be beneficial to society because, “Potential sex offenders use child pornography as a substitute for sex against children.”

Here is my view; Child pornography is STILL hurting the children! It's no better then if some sick fuck had sex with them! Child porn is illegal and should be! Taking naked pictures of children doing acts is still harmful and should not be allowed. It is NOT beneficial to society for one other reason, what happens when it's not enough for pedophiles? They will then seek out children to reenact the porn they have seen. 

Pedophiles are vile creatures who are nothing like the rest of us! They are NOT the same as homosexuals or heterosexuals or any other orientation. They have a sexual attraction to children who have not even begun to mature yet. They want these little kids because they have a deeper underlying need to feel powerful and in control! Children do not understand sex, or touching or any other mature acts like this. They get scared, they do not like it and they do NOT know that is going on. It IS harmful to them and it will hurt their future if they can't get the help to recover from the traumatic experiences.

Homosexuals (gays) are not the same as pedophiles. Gay couples are of age and are mature enough to consent to sexual acts. They do not seek out young children to overpower and control, they seek out the same sex that are either the same age or are still OF AGE to make mature decisions. That is a sexual orientation, that should and is legal.

Anyone who has kids or has family with kids knows how disturbing it is to even think that some adult man (or woman) might someday be able to legally touch and have sexual relations with your child! I don't know about you but if I have kids and some older man tries to do anything to them, I will be in jail for shooting the bastard regardless of if it's legal or not.

This is sickening news and it's even more so that it's actually gotten this far into the government and authority systems. It's gone through the White House even, and they are AGREEING with some of the crap that these pedophiles are pushing for! This is showing that the people we have elected to be in charge of this country have little to no moral standing or common sense!

What do YOU think of this sickening situation? Do you agree with the government and think pedophiles should have the same rights? Or do you think this is sickening and shouldn't have ever even been brought up? Leave your thoughts in the comments below.

Sources: pedophiles want same rights

Zimmerman trial Vs Alexander trial who's REALLY guilty?

I just learned of this whole Zimmerman case and the verdict and I have seen a lot of controversial conversations and arguments on it. So, naturally I decided to blog about my thoughts on this verdict and case after reading a few articles and the backgrounds of both parties. I have also seen a lot of pictures on social media sites comparing this case to several others such as the Casey Anthony's not guilty verdict and the Andrea Yates case with her being not guilty then the Marissa Alexander case with her being found GUILTY without killing anyone.

Lets start by looking at the victim's background and side of this situation. Trayvon Martin was an 17 year old junior in High school. His parents are divorced and his fathers new fiance lived in the neighborhood that he was shot in. He was visiting his father and his fathers fiance when he was shot down in the street. Martin's background might sound sketchy and he did seem like a troubled youth but he was never found to be violent. Martin had been suspended from school twice due to truancy and writing graffiti on the school grounds. Martin had also been in possession of a marijuana pipe and some jewelry that the police automatically thought to be stolen. On the night he was killed, the last anyone saw of him was when he bought candy and an Arazona Tea from a 7-11 store.

Now lets look at the defendants background and side of the situation. George Zimmerman is an insurance underwriter and was going to collage. He is a 200lb man (aprox) at 30 years old with several acts of violence in his past. At age 21 he was arrested for the assault of a police officer and resisting arrest. Then in 2005 Zimmerman was charged with domestic violence and has a restraining order from his ex-fiance. Zimmerman had called the non-emergency police several times in 18 months, five of those were reports of suspicious looking men around the neighborhood. To me, Zimmerman seemed to be of the paranoid sort that took matters into his own hands when he shouldn't. On the night of the killing, Zimmerman had called the police about a suspicious looking man walking around at night. He thought he was suspicious due to the fact that he was walking around at night in the rain just looking at houses. Now if you think about it, if you where depressed because your parents had taken you away from your friends and home what would you be doing? Martin was most likely only out walking around because he was upset.

Zimmerman blatantly disobeyed what the police dispatcher had told him while he was running after Martin that night. The police dispatcher told him NOT to follow or chase the 'suspect' but Zimmerman did so anyway. Zimmerman eventually shot and killed Martin who was unarmed, and only 70 yards from where he was staying.

Many different scenarios could have taken place but one seems to pull to my mind. From looking over the backgrounds of both persons and reading through articles of the trial what plays out in my mind is this:

Martin was walking home from the store after buying some snacks and was wearing a hooded sweatshirt due to the rain. He was probably upset about being away from his family and friends and from being suspended from school. Zimmerman, who already had a violent history, was part of neighborhood watch and from having so many break ins and robberies in his area saw Martin and automatically thought he was a bad person. Zimmerman's defenses were up and alert due to this and he wanted to take action thinking the police would arrive too late so he took matters into his own hands. He chased after Martin who was unarmed and probably startled him. Martin begins to run seeing someone is chasing him and then turns to defend himself against the mysterious man coming for him. Martin and Zimmerman have a scuffle and both attack one another leaving cuts and bruises. Zimmerman gets even more defensive and worries for his life thinking this young man might have a gun or knife and pulls out his own. Zimmerman (not thinking rationally) shoots Martin who was unarmed and fighting for his own life. 

To me this seems like the most realistic situation. I mean if you think about it, Martin was a young boy who was walking home at night in the rain and is being followed by a strange vehicle. Martin gets scared and starts to run, Zimmerman, thinking he is high and mighty, chases after him. A fight breaks out from both scared men and one gets shot. I'm not saying Zimmerman's verdict is right but it should make you think. Both parties where standing their ground.



Now, lets take a look at the other case where the verdict ends differently. A 31 year old Florida woman was found guilty of aggravated assault and attempted murder when she fired warning shots at her abusive husband. She had already filed an order of protection against him and claims she was protecting herself from another beating. Marissa Alexander has never been in trouble with the law before yet when she tries to defend herself against a brutally abusive husband she gets charged and convicted.
Here is a quote from Wikipidia on this case:

Alexander had a restraining order issued against her ex husband at the time and, during the day of the incident, had returned to their old home to collect clothes and some possessions thinking he was not there. Her ex husband was there, with their children, and they began to argue. After the argument became heated, Marissa Alexander returned to her car, picked up her firearm, and returned inside the house where she threatened him with the handgun before firing a warning shot into the wall. She was charged with reckless endangerment of children and threatening with a deadly weapon.

The stand your ground law-

In the United States, stand-your-ground law states that a person may justifiably use force in self-defense when there is reasonable belief of an unlawful threat, without an obligation to retreat first. The concept sometimes exists in statutory law and sometimes through common law precedents.

So what do you think about these cases? Who was in the right or wrong? Or was anyone right?



Sources: Zimmerman verdict  and Alexander case Alexander Case2
Other source: wikipedia

Paula Deen under fire for what?

News Article

Paula Deen is a famous chef and owner of a successful restaurant. She has put out 14 cookbooks and is very well known for it. Now however she is getting slandered for using the 'N-word' approximately 30 years ago.
Paula Deen and her son's Jamie and Bobby own and run the restaurant The Lady & Sons where some of the former employees claim to have had to listen to racial slurs and jokes from the owners. One employee even claims that she was sexually harassed by Paula's brother Earl Heirs. You can see the lawsuit here: Lawsuit

Paula Deen seems to be having a lot of racial secrets coming out about her past and her restaurant with the white staff allowed to use the front restrooms and the black staff having to use the back restrooms. There is also talk of her planning a

"true Southern wedding" with an all-black waitstaff wearing white shirts and black pants. Deen is alleged to have said, "You know in the Shirley Temple days, they used to tap dance around."

 Now the thing you must understand is that Paula Deen was born January 19, 1947, and in the 1940's and 50's when she grew up blacks did not have the same civil rights as whites. Employers could legally refuse to consider black applicants for jobs. Landlords could refuse to rent houses to black people. Blacks and whites lived in separate neighborhoods. Often, blacks were barred from registering to vote. This is how she was raised, to be taught by society that blacks where not equal. As she got older however, and time and society changed she may not have changed as much as it did. A lot of older people in America are used to the old ways that they grew up. They still hold onto the old beliefs but they do try to change.

Knowing this, you really can't blame her for what she said so long ago. Many, MANY people even now say that word a lot and often. Some people mean it and some just say it to piss people off. Others still say it jokingly. If a famous black person admitted to calling someone or saying "Cracker" they would probably not get as much attention as she is now.

Her past does not, however, give her the right to treat staff so poorly. Now none of these accusations have been found to be true or not but if they are then she is wrong in doing so. As a business owner and someone who is looked up upon she should know better then to let her old fashioned ways get in the way of business and being a role model. She claims that she doesn't care about your skin color, only what is in your heart. If these racial claims about how she runs her business prove to be false accusations then she shouldn't be blamed for anything more.

Paula Deen is an older southern woman who grew up when slavery was still a thing and blacks didn't exactly have any rights. Is it any wonder that someone who grew up in this era has said the N-word a few times more then what she is willing to admit to? When she gets slandered so much for admitting to saying it once? It would be like judging someone who survived Pearl Harbor for calling a Japanese person a "Buddhahead" or some other slurred term.

People need to let it go. Forgive Paula Deen, she is just acting in the way she was raised to act.

Dog Breed restrictions

It has come to my attention that their is a list of 75 dog breeds that are either banned or restricted. Many of these dogs have great temperaments and have no right being on any banned list! I will not go through all dogs on the list but you can check out the list here: 75 innocent dog breeds

Ok so I will start off with a breed that most people wouldn't ever think is a danger to society: ALASKAN MALAMUTE, the larger breed with a lot of fur that looks like a husky. This dogs temperament is as the quote says,

The Alaskan Malamute is extremely loyal and intelligent, sweet and most affectionate toward its master. Great with children who are old enough to play with him safely. If its canine instincts are met, it matures into a dignified and mellow adult dog. They are very friendly and therefore are not suitable as guard dogs.

Now how in the world did this dog get on a banned/restricted list? Apparently it is due to the wolfish look they can have.

Another dog on the list is AMERICAN BULLDOG, despite it's strong muscular body build and possibly intimidating loyalty, this dog's temperament is described as:

The American Bulldog is loyal, reliable, brave and determined. Not a hostile dog. Alert and self-confident, this breed genuinely loves children. It is known for its acts of heroism toward its master. It has strong protective instincts, and needs a firm, confident, consistent pack leader.

So how can a dog breed that is known to be heroes and be awesome with children on the banned/restricted list? Because people lump this breed in with Pit bulls. Yes that is the reason, and it's a stupid one.

Third breed I want to talk about is the AMERICAN HUSKY, you might think of this as the black and white dogs with a fluffy tail but this is the American Husky, not Siberian. This breed is actually almost all gone!

The American husky, or Canadian Eskimo Dog, is a very old breed originating nearly 1,000 years ago where the breed was raised by the natives of Thule. Unfortunately, this breed is almost at the point of extinction.

Not a lot of pages on this breed, I was lucky to find this one so I will share it with you now: American_husky

Some other dogs that I will not go into as much depth about are Boxers, Bulldogs, Eskimo, Fox Terrier, Pugs I mean so many dogs on this list have an above average temperament! Just because you get a few bad apples, does that mean you will never eat one again? Honestly this is just bullshit discrimination against dogs. Society thinks that just because a dog looks mean or has bitten ONE person then the whole breed is evil. Well guess what, any dog can bite, any dog can turn on a dime and lose it. They are like us, they can only handle so much stress and bullshit before they snap! Also it depends on how you raise them.

Another dog that nobody will be surprised to hear on the list is the American Pit Bull Terrier. I own a pit bull mix and he is a baby! He is sweet, and a flirt. He gives kisses and cuddles and he is also loyal and protective of me. He is a great dog and I would love to be able to get a full blooded pit bull. So many people have the wrong idea about these dogs and it's due to
A) Stupid owners- If you raise a dog wrong they will be a confused dog. If you punish them by beating them they will become fearful and more likely to be aggressive. If you don't take control of your dog at an early age during training then you will never have full control later on.
B) Misidentification- I see it all the time, so many people just assume a dog is a certain breed cause of the way it looks. Did you know a lot of these so called 'Pit Bulls' that attack people are actually not pit bulls? Boxers, American Bulldogs, Alpha Blue Blooded Bulldogs, Dogos, Bull Mastiffs, Presa Canario and even some Labradors. So many other breeds are mistaken for pit bulls, makes you wonder how many pit bulls have actually attacked people huh? If you want the full list, here is a link: find the pit
C) Bad Owners- These people are the reason why pit bulls have such a bad rep. These BAD owners are the ones who use them to fight, or train them to be mean and aggressive. These people who use dogs as weapons and pons to make money are the ones who need to be banned and restricted from owning any animal. Hating the breed that has been mistreated is like hating an abuse victim for lashing out due to being hit everyday by a spouse or parent.

So the next time you think about buying a dog or looking for a place to rent, think about what breed you have and if it will be allowed in your home or even another state. Then when you think you see a pit bull in a pet store or on the street, think to yourself "Do I REALLY know what pit bulls look like?" because for all you know, you could be scaring yourself over a fake reputation on the wrong dog.

Clay Creations for sale (NC)

Well due to this blog dieing before it was even able to live.... I have decided to try and post my handmade clay creations here. If you like random and cute clay creations, then you should take a look at this link. I make pencil toppers, pendants, mini figures and medium figures. From Teddy Bears to Dragons and Wizards. If you want to check it out please feel free to do so! I'm making new things all the time and I'm hoping to get this little online business into working operation.

Wolfies Creations

Sample Works:

Horse meat for humans?

http://news.yahoo.com/horses-could-soon-slaughtered-meat-us-080907323.html

Have you ever thought about trying a new kind of meat? Maybe squid (calamari), Alligator, Shark fin, Snake even? People eat these animals all the time, maybe not all in the united states, but all over. A lot of Americans do however eat snake meat and alligator. A ton of animals in the United States are killed and eaten every year, some in mass others in smaller portions. Cows (beef) are breed and raised to be food for us, same as chickens and pigs but horses are different for some reason. Is it because we can get more use out of them instead of just killing them for meat? Is it because too many people see them as pets and not food? You can ride a horse just as you could probably ride a cow! Horses can learn to do tricks and love you and have personality, but you know what so do pigs. Didn't know that did you? Pigs are actually highly intelligent but the only thing you probably think of when we say pig is BACON! If you don't want to believe me on their level of intelligence then here is a link: Pig Smarts  
Now pigs are actually just as smart as dogs but you wouldn't eat dog would you? Or cat even? Why is this? It's because they are seen as pets, as members of the family and as loyal animals that have emotions and feelings just like we do. But you know what, so do cows, pigs, chickens, turkeys, ect. Any animal we eat has feelings and emotions just like us. Any animals could also be someones pet if our society had been different.

Just think about this- If this world had been different, and cows were used like horses, and pigs/chickens used like dogs/cats then what do you think we would be mass producing to eat? Yes that's right, dogs, cats, and horses. The only reason why we have such a strong feeling and sense of right and wrong is because we learned it, we have been taught that eating some animals is ok, but eating others is wrong. If I really wanted to I could go into more depth about other ANIMALS that CAN but are not supposed to be eaten. Well, they are eaten by wild animals but not its own kind... I'm talking about humans. Humans are animals and you know what? If we were not the dominant species on this planet we could very well be some other creatures food source. Wild animals already make meals out of us yet we shun and blame them for it but why? Do you blame yourself for eating other animals? I didn't think so. Another thing I want to mention on this subject is that cannibalism is seen in the wild a lot more then you might think. Lions will kill and eat other lions of different prides, male Lions will kill and sometimes even eat the cubs of other lionesses in order to mate with her. Tigers are solitary animals in the wild and will kill each other and on occasion will eat the other. A large number of reptiles eat their own kind all the time! Fish eat other fish of the same species and even wild dogs will eat each other.

Now back to the main topic of this blog (seeing as how I've gotten a bit off track), horse meat. Why is it so taboo for humans to eat it? I love horses just as much as I love cows but I still eat beef. I think cows are absolutely adorable but yet I will still make myself a hamburger or a steak. Why? Because it tastes good and my body needs meat. Horses are really no different to me, I would eat horse meat if I had the choice just to taste it and see if I liked it. Horses are already used as pet food so why not use it for humans as well? If you think it's wrong for horses to be slaughtered at all even for pet food then what would our pets eat? The crap that some companies do is just mix the leftovers of YOUR food into a grinder. Left over parts of intestines/bones/feet/fat/spoiled meats <-- this is what is called MEAT BY PRODUCT. I would rather my dog eat a dog food made from nothing but horse meat and some veggies then that garbage! Would you eat something that was a BY PRODUCT? No, you would want to eat actual food, not a food-like product that I also see on the shelves of our stores.

Horse meat might also be good for the economy of food distribution and slaughter houses anyway. Beef/pork/chicken is so mass produced that these animals are breed like crazy and given an ungodly amount of chemicals and steroids to make them grow faster, larger and to kill off any disease or sickness they might have. If we allow horses into this mix it might take some of the pressure off of the other animals if people allow and accept the new change of meat into their diets. Hell if anything, I believe they should allow deers to be produced for meat. I've had my share of deer jerky and deer steak and it is really good! I can't wait till my husband gets a hunting license and we can go and get our own meat instead of having to rely on chemically enhanced beef. You can use deer meat as a sub for beef I've done it before and it was still very good.

Horse meat has already been leaked into our food in the United Kingdom and they lived. Probably didn't even taste a real difference. So it's not that odd to think about adding horses as an extra meat source. Again, I think if people accept it, that it could lighten up the demand for beef and possibly pork. Chicken, on the other hand is different. I would think that they would have an equal amount of turkey as they do chicken to lighten up the demand of it but they don't seem to. Lamb is another one I would like to go out and buy but it's special ordered here where I live.

So that's my opinion, what are yours? Do you think horse meat should be introduced into our diets? Why or why not?

Catholic Youth Organization bans girls from Football

http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/14/us/philadelphia-archdiocese-boys-only-football/index.html?hpt=us_r1

Football, a sport that in the past was only meant for boys and men, has now evolved into letting girls and women play it as well. Apparently the Catholic Youth Organization of Philadelphia hasn't caught up with the times. An 11-year old girl, Caroline has been playing football sense she was in kindergarten. Inspired by her older brother who also plays football, she started playing and loves it. She claims that she has never been hurt while playing and that she has a lot of fun playing the sport but is hurt that she now can't play due to the Catholic Church's rules.

Hearing this girl talking in the video interview for news lets you see that she knows what she is doing and that she knows this is wrong. Personally she seems very smart for her age to! This girl has a very bright and optional future ahead of her if she is able to keep playing sports. Her mother and father disagree with the Youth Organizations rules and putting their daughter on the bench. Her mother even went and made a petition for not just her daughter but for all girls who want to but can't, play football on Change.org that currently has 108,728 signatures and is now closed.

The young 11 year old also made some awesome points when she was told it was a safety issue to allow girls to play, she points out that it's not just a safety issue for her because she is a girl but also a safety issue for anyone that goes out onto the field. This is truly an unjust and uncalled for ruling.

I personally feel that all girls should have the right to play whatever sport they want to! I mean we have male cheerleaders and that was another huge issue that society had at first but now it's more acceptable. What are your thoughts on girls playing football and other sports? Do you think it was right or wrong for the Church to have such a sexist ruling? Post a comment below and explain your opinions.